Former
French Foreign Minister: The War against Syria was Planned Two
years before “The Arab Spring”
By Gearóid Ó Colmáin
By Gearóid Ó Colmáin
In an interview with the
French TV station LCP, former French minister for Foreign
Affairs Roland Dumas said:
‘’ I’m going to tell you something. I was in England two years before the violence in Syria on other business. I met with top British officials, who confessed to me that they were preparing something in Syria.This was in Britain not in America. Britain was organizing an invasion of rebels into Syria.They even asked me, although I was no longer minister for foreign affairs, if I would like to participate.
Naturally, I refused, I said I’m French, that doesn’t interest me.’’
Dumas went
on give the audience a quick lesson on the real reason for the
war that has now claimed the lives of tens of thousands of
people.
‘’This operation goes way back. It was prepared, preconceived and planned… in the region it is important to know that this Syrian regime has a very anti-Israeli stance.Consequently, everything that moves in the region- and I have this from the former Israeli prime minister who told me ‘we’ll try to get on with our neighbours but those who don’t agree with us will be destroyed.It’s a type of politics, a view of history, why not after all. But one should know about it.’’
Dumas is a
retired French foreign minister who is obliged to use discretion
when revealing secrets which could affect French foreign policy.
That is why he made the statement ‘I am French, that doesn’t
interest me’. He could not reveal France’s role in the British
plan as he would be exposing himself to prosecution for
revealing state secrets.
There have
been many disinformation agents in the British and French press,
many of them well known ‘leftist’ war correspondents and
commentators, who have tried to pretend that Israel secretly
supports Assad. Those who make such arguments are either
stupid, ignorant or deliberate disinformation agents of NATO and
Israel.
Israel’s
support for Al Qaeda militants in Syria has even been admitted
by the mainstream press. For example, Germany’s Die Welt
newspaper published a report on June 12th on Israel’s
medical treatment of the Al Qaeda fighters.
Israel
planned this war of annihilation years ago in accordance with
the Yinon Plan, which advocates balkanization of all states that
pose a threat to Israel. The Zionist entity is using Britain and
France to goad the reluctant Obama administration into sending
more American troops to their death in Syria on behalf of Tel
Aviv.
Of all the
aggressor states against Syria, Israel has been the quietest
from the start. That is because Laurent Fabius, Francois
Holland, William Hague and David Cameron are doing their bidding
by attempting to drag Israel’s American Leviathan into another
ruinous war so that Israel can get control of the Middle East’s
energy reserves, eventually replacing the United States as the
ruling state in the world. It has also been necessary for Tel
Aviv to remain silent so as not to expose their role in the
‘revolutions’, given the fact that the Jihadist fanatics don’t
realize they are fighting for Israel.
This is
the ideology of Zionism which cares no more for Jews than it
does for its perceived enemies. The Jewish colony is
determined to become a ruling state in the Middle East in the
insane delusion that this will enable it to replace the United
States as a global hegemon, once the US collapses fighting
Israel’s wars.
Israeli
Prime Minister once told American talk show host Bill Maher that
the reason why Israel always wins short conflicts, while the
United States gets bogged down in endless wars. ‘’ The secret is
that we have America’’, he said.
But Israel
is itself slowly collapsing. If one excludes the enslaved
Palestinian population, the Jewish state still has the highest
level of poverty in the developed world with more and more Jews
choosing to leave the ‘promised’ land, a garrison state led by
mad men, an anti-Semitic entity threatening to engulf the world
in war and destruction. Israel cares no more about its own
working class Jews than any other ethnic community.
In fact,
if the Likudnik crooks running the Israeli colony get their way,
working class Israelis will be among the first to pay as they
are conscripted to fight terrorists created by their own
government. With orthodox Jews protesting in the streets of New
York against Israel and Haredi Jewish minority opposing Israel’s
rampant militarism, Zionism is coming under increased attack
from Jewish religious authorities and non-Zionist Jews both
inside and outside of the occupied territories.
This is
not the first time that Roland Dumas has spoken out against wars
of aggression waged by successive French regimes. In 2011 he
revealed that he had been asked by the United States when he was
foreign minister in the Mitterrand administration to organize
the bombing of Libya. On that occasion the French refused to
cooperate. Dumas, a lawyer by profession, offered to defend
Colonel Gaddafi, at the International Criminal Court in the
event of his arrest by Nato.
Dumas was
also vocal in condemning France’s brutal neo-colonial bombing of
the Ivory Coast earlier in 2011, were death squads and
terrorists similar to those later deployed in Libya and Syria
were unleashed upon the Ivoirian population in order to install
a IMF puppet dictator Alassane Quattara in power. Gbagbo was
described as one of the greatest African leaders of the past 20
years by Jean Ziegler, sociologist and former member of the
Advisory Committee of the UN Human Rights Council.
Gbagbo had
plans to nationalize banks and wrest control of the country’s
currency from the colonial finance institutions in Paris. He
also wanted to roll back many of the worst effects of IMF
restructuring by nationalizing industries and creating a
functioning, universal free health service. All of this
threatened the interests of French corporations in the former
French colony. So, the Parisian oligarchy went to work to find a
suitable replacement as caretaker of their Ivoirian colony.
They sent
in armed terrorist gangs, or ‘rebel’s in the doublespeak of
imperialism, who murdered all before them while the French media
blamed president Gbagbo for the violence that ensued. Gbagbo and
Gaddafi had opposed Africom, the Pentagon’s plan to recolonize
Africa. That was another reason for the 2011 bombing of their
two African countries.
The
formula is always the same. Imperialism backs ‘rebels’, whenever
its interests are threatened by regimes that love their country
more than foreign corporations. One should not forgot that
during the Spanish Civil War of 1936, General Franco and his
cronies were also ‘rebels’ and they, like their counterparts in
Libya in 2011, were bombed to power by foreign powers, replacing
a progressive, republican administration with fascism.
There are
pro-Israeli fanatics in France who have used the analogy of the
Spanish Civil War as justification for intervention in Libya and
Syria. The pseudo-philosopher Henry Bernard Levy is one of
them. Of course, the ignoramus Levy doesn’t realize that the
reason France, England and the USA did not officially intervene
in the Spanish Civil War is because they were covertly helping
the ‘rebels’ from the start. They enabled arms shipments to the
Francoist ‘rebels’ while preventing arms deliveries to the
Spanish government, who, like Syria today, were helped by
Moscow. Anyone who has studied the Spanish Civil War knows that
all the imperialist countries wanted Franco as a bulwark against
communism.
There is
nothing imperialism loves more than a rebel without a cause.
What imperialism hates, however, are revolutionaries. That is
why the ‘rebels’ which imperialism sends into other countries to
colonize them on behalf of foreign banks and corporations, have
to be marketed as ‘revolutionaries’ in order to assure the
support of the Monty Python brigade of petty-bourgeois, ‘
leftist’ dupes such as Democracy Now! and their ilk.
Dumas is
not the only top French official to denounce the New World
Order. Former French ambassador to Syria Michel Raimbaud wrote
a book in 2012 entitled ‘Le Soudan dans tous les états’, where
he revealed how Israel planned and instigated a civil war in
South Sudan in order to balkanize a country led by a
pro-Palestinian government. He also exposed the pro-Israeli
media groups and ‘human rights’ NGOS who created the
‘humanitarian’ narrative calling for military intervention by
the United States in the conflict.
The
subject was covered extensively by African investigative
journalist Charles Onana in his 2009 book, Al-Bashir & Darfour
LA CONTRE ENQUÊTE.
There are
many more retired French officials who are speaking out about
the ruinous policies of this French government, including the
former head of French domestic intelligence Yves Bonnet. There
have also been reports of dissent in the French armed forces and
intelligence apparatus.
After the
assassination of Colonel Gaddafi in October 2011, the former
French ambassador to Libya Christian Graeff told French radio
station France Culture that it was responsible for the diffusion
of lies and war propaganda on behalf of Nato throughout the
war. Graeff also warned the broadcasters that such
disinformation could only work on the minds of serfs but not in
a country of free minds.
The power
of the Israeli lobby in France is a subject rarely discussed in
polite circles. In France there is a law against questioning or
denial of the holocaust. However, denial of the Korean
holocaust, Guatemalan holocaust, Palestinian holocaust,
Indonesian holocaust and the dozens of other US/Israeli
supported genocides is not only perfectly legal but is the
respectable norm.
The same
lobby which introduced the Loi Gayssot in 1990, effectively
ending freedom of expression in France, would also like to ban
any independent investigations of genocides whose narratives
they have written, such as the Rwanda genocide, where Israel
played a key role in supporting the ‘rebels’ led by Paul Kagame,
who invaded Rwanda from Uganda from 1991 to 1994, leading to the
genocide of both Tutus and Tutsis. Many serious scholars have
written about the Rwandan genocide, which the Israel lobby
repeatedly uses as a case study to justify ‘humanitarian’
intervention by Western powers. The Zionist thought police
would like to see such authors prosecuted for ‘negating’
imperialism’s disgusting lies on African conflicts.
Now, the
Israeli Lobby is forcing the (their) French government to
prosecute twitter messages which the lobby deems ‘anti-Semitic’.
This is one further step towards the creation of a totalitarian
state where any criticism of imperialism, foreign wars, racism,
oppression, perhaps eventually capitalism itself could fall
under the rubric of ‘anti-Semitism’.
These
people are sick, and those who cow down to them are sicker.
Perhaps the etymology of sickness, a word cognate with the
German Sicherheit (security) according to dictionary.com, is not
a coincidence. For what is particularly sick about our society
is the cult of security, endless surveillance, ubiquitous
cameras, the cult of the all seeing eye, the prurient gaze as
part of the incessant discourse on terrorism by those who
specialize in the training of the very terrorists they claim to
be protecting us from. Whether or not the words security and
sickness are linguistically related, they are certainly cognate
in a philosophical sense.
Roland
Dumas and others like him should be highly commended for having
to guts to say what so many others are too morally corrupt, too
weak and cowardly to admit.
As the
French government and its media agencies drum up hysteria for
war on Syria, Roland Dumas, now in the twilight of his years, is
warning people of the consequences of not understanding where
Israel is leading the world. Will enough people heed the
warning?
No comments:
Post a Comment